Who coined the term heresy of paraphrase?

Critic Cleanth Brooks
One of Eliot’s greatest admirers, the New Critic Cleanth Brooks, coined the phrase ‘the heresy of paraphrase’.

What are some of the consequences of allowing ourselves to be misled by the heresy of paraphrase?

If we allow ourselves to be misled by the heresy of paraphrase, we run the risk of doing even more violence to the internal order of the poem itself. By taking the paraphrase as our point of stance, we misconceive the function of metaphor and meter.

What according to cleanth Brooks is the paradox of poetry?

Cleanth Brooks’ “Language of Paradox” Paradox in poetry means that tension at the surface of a verse can lead to apparent contradictions and hypocrisies.

What do New Critics emphasize while reading a poem?

New Criticism was a formalist movement in literary theory that dominated American literary criticism in the middle decades of the 20th century. It emphasized close reading, particularly of poetry, to discover how a work of literature functioned as a self-contained, self-referential aesthetic object.

What did New Criticism mean by heresy of paraphrase?

referred to as the “heresy of paraphrase,” the words being those of the American literary critic Cleanth Brooks (The Well Wrought Urn, 1949). The heresy is that of assuming that the meaning of a work of art (particularly of poetry) can be paraphrased.

What do you mean by heresy of paraphrase?

“Heresy of paraphrase”: to believe that paraphrasing a fictional plot or a lyric poem’s thoughts constitutes an interpretation, or to believe that interpreting such a paraphrase can constitute an interpretation of the text of the work, itself (also called “falling into plot summary” when you do it in your papers).

What is the function of a paradox?

Paradox, apparently self-contradictory statement, the underlying meaning of which is revealed only by careful scrutiny. The purpose of a paradox is to arrest attention and provoke fresh thought.

Why is New Criticism considered so important even today?

This analysis tool is valuable because it forces readers to focus on literary elements. Specifically, it disregards the text’s author, its cultural context, and its effects on readers. But New Criticism doesn’t stand up well on its own, especially with longer texts.

What do New Critics consider?

Formal elements such as rhyme, meter, setting, characterization, and plot were used to identify the theme of the text. In addition to the theme, the New Critics also looked for paradox, ambiguity,irony, and tension to help establish the single best and most unified interpretation of the text.

What is alternative paraphrasing?

Paraphrasing means formulating someone else’s ideas in your own words. To paraphrase a source, you have to rewrite a passage without changing the meaning of the original text. Paraphrasing is an alternative to quoting, where you copy someone’s exact words and put them in quotation marks.

What is meant by intentional fallacy?

Intentional fallacy, term used in 20th-century literary criticism to describe the problem inherent in trying to judge a work of art by assuming the intent or purpose of the artist who created it.

Who is the author of the heresy of paraphrase?

“The Heresy of Paraphrase” is the title of a chapter in The Well-Wrought Urn, a seminal work of the New Criticism by Cleanth Brooks.

What was the heresy of paraphrase by Cleanth Brooks?

” The Heresy of Paraphrase ” is the title of a chapter in The Well-Wrought Urn, a seminal work of the New Criticism by Cleanth Brooks. Brooks argued that meaning in poetry is irreducible, because “a true poem is a simulacrum of reality…an experience rather than any mere statement about experience or any mere abstraction from experience.”

Who is the founder of the New Criticism?

William K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley coined the term “intentional fallacy”; other terms associated with New Criticism include “affective fallacy,” “heresy of paraphrase,” and “ ambiguity .”

What was the intentional fallacy of New Criticism?

The intentional fallacy occurs when readers claim to understand an author’s intended meaning for a work of literature. The New Critics believed that a literary work belongs to the readers, to the public, which suggests that we should read the work isolated from what the author may have said about the work.